I was under the impression that the FAE is about judging others, not ourselves. Yes, we come up with convenient explanations for ourselves, when really we should be ascribing our actions to our personalities more often. If you lie to yourself it is very hard for others to call you on it, so such lies can be cheap and frequent. I would be surprised if many people here disagreed with this. I don’t think this ‘defends’ the FAE though—the first sentence of the thread introducing the correspondence bias is “We tend to see far too direct a correspondence between others’ actions and personalities.” (emphasis mine).
So let me repeat/clarify my question: On the whole, do you think that people are describing actions by other people to personalities not often enough, as opposed to too often?
I would argue people aren’t ascribing their own actions to their personalities often enough.
I was under the impression that the FAE is about judging others, not ourselves. Yes, we come up with convenient explanations for ourselves, when really we should be ascribing our actions to our personalities more often. If you lie to yourself it is very hard for others to call you on it, so such lies can be cheap and frequent. I would be surprised if many people here disagreed with this. I don’t think this ‘defends’ the FAE though—the first sentence of the thread introducing the correspondence bias is “We tend to see far too direct a correspondence between others’ actions and personalities.” (emphasis mine).
So let me repeat/clarify my question: On the whole, do you think that people are describing actions by other people to personalities not often enough, as opposed to too often?