It might help your case to write a version of this that removes most of the interpretation you’ve given here, and tries to present just the claims you know to be objective truths. While ‘the plaintiff is failing to personally provide an objective neutral point of view’ seems like a particularly disturbing sort of argument to dismiss something like this on, it is nonetheless the case that this does seem to be the principal defense, and most of those comments are pointing to real issues in your presentation.
Yeah, I was similarly thinking that someone (on Jessica’s side of the story) should rewrite the articles. To remove the distracting parts, so that it would be easier to focus on whatever is left.
It might help your case to write a version of this that removes most of the interpretation you’ve given here, and tries to present just the claims you know to be objective truths. While ‘the plaintiff is failing to personally provide an objective neutral point of view’ seems like a particularly disturbing sort of argument to dismiss something like this on, it is nonetheless the case that this does seem to be the principal defense, and most of those comments are pointing to real issues in your presentation.
Disclaimer, I’m an outsider.
Yeah, I was similarly thinking that someone (on Jessica’s side of the story) should rewrite the articles. To remove the distracting parts, so that it would be easier to focus on whatever is left.