Agreed that if a theory T can explain both actual and counterfactual events equally well, then that’s a huge weakness in T. (In fact, it makes T pretty much useless.) This is both true and important.
That said, your understanding of what kinds of explanations “evolution” provides is deeply confused.
Agreed that if a theory T can explain both actual and counterfactual events equally well, then that’s a huge weakness in T. (In fact, it makes T pretty much useless.) This is both true and important.
That said, your understanding of what kinds of explanations “evolution” provides is deeply confused.