Segment Anything is truly open source under the Apache 2.0 license.
Massively Multilingual Speech is CC-BY-NC, a standard but noncommercial and thus non-open-source license.
I’m an open-source maintainer myself, though not an absolutist or convinced that eg Llama should have been open-sourced. I do however find it pretty frustrating when these models are incorrectly described as open source (including by Yann LeCun, who ought to know better). As is, we collectively get many of the research benefits, all the misuse, but very little of the commercial innovation or neat product improvements that open-sourcing would bring.
Re:
Note that only one of Meta’s recent releases have been open-source.
For Llama, the code is available under GPL-3 (ie open source), but the model itself and weights are under a bespoke non-commercial license.
Segment Anything is truly open source under the Apache 2.0 license.
Massively Multilingual Speech is CC-BY-NC, a standard but noncommercial and thus non-open-source license.
I’m an open-source maintainer myself, though not an absolutist or convinced that eg Llama should have been open-sourced. I do however find it pretty frustrating when these models are incorrectly described as open source (including by Yann LeCun, who ought to know better). As is, we collectively get many of the research benefits, all the misuse, but very little of the commercial innovation or neat product improvements that open-sourcing would bring.
Yeah, a better way to phrase this might be: “Meta’s dismissal of potential security risks from making code and model weights publically available.”