HPMOR: - Yes, all of it: 912, 55.7%
REFERRAL TYPE: Referred by HPMOR: 400, 24.4%
EY’s Harry Potter fanfic is more popular around here than I’d thought.
PHYSICAL INTERACTION WITH LW COMMUNITY:
Yes, all the time: 94, 5.7%
Yes, sometimes: 179, 10.9%
CFAR WORKSHOP ATTENDANCE:
Yes, a full workshop: 105, 6.4%
A class but not a full-day workshop: 40, 2.4%
LESS WRONG USE:
Poster (Discussion, not Main): 221, 12.9%
Poster (Main): 103, 6.3%
~6% at the maximum “buy-in” levels on these 3 items. My guess is they are all made up of a similiar group of people?
I’d be curious to know of 6.3% aho have published articles in Main (and, to a lesser extent, of the 12.9% who have published in Discussion), how many unique user are there?
$ cat Desktop/lwpublic2013.csv |wc -l
1481
$ cat Desktop/lwpublic2013.csv | grep "Yes all the time" | wc -l
85
$ cat Desktop/lwpublic2013.csv | grep "Yes I have been to a full (3+ day) workshop" | wc -l
91
$ cat Desktop/lwpublic2013.csv | grep "Yes I have been to a full (3+ day) workshop" | grep "Yes all the time" |wc -l
37
The statistically expected number would be 5, so that’s a strong correlation (p<10^-15), but I wouldn’t call it “one group of people”.
Things that stuck out to me:
HPMOR: - Yes, all of it: 912, 55.7% REFERRAL TYPE: Referred by HPMOR: 400, 24.4%
EY’s Harry Potter fanfic is more popular around here than I’d thought.
PHYSICAL INTERACTION WITH LW COMMUNITY: Yes, all the time: 94, 5.7% Yes, sometimes: 179, 10.9%
CFAR WORKSHOP ATTENDANCE: Yes, a full workshop: 105, 6.4% A class but not a full-day workshop: 40, 2.4%
LESS WRONG USE: Poster (Discussion, not Main): 221, 12.9% Poster (Main): 103, 6.3%
~6% at the maximum “buy-in” levels on these 3 items. My guess is they are all made up of a similiar group of people?
I’d be curious to know of 6.3% aho have published articles in Main (and, to a lesser extent, of the 12.9% who have published in Discussion), how many unique user are there?
Haven’t you seen all those sprawling HPMOR discussion threads with >500 comments usually?
I hadn’t paid attention, no.
It was the ~25% referral rate that was pretty shocking to me. And 55% of LWers have read all of it?! Wow.
I use it as a tool to encourage others to join. It’s very good for that.
I tell people that if they get to the end of HP:MOR and want more MOR, then they should come try out LW.
The statistically expected number would be 5, so that’s a strong correlation (p<10^-15), but I wouldn’t call it “one group of people”.
I couldn’t find LessWrong Use in the csv data.