Why do you think this is helpful? The way you’re deploying it, it seems like a fully general argument against any form of foresight. Obviously the essay is pretty good and a useful lens but using it as a fully general dictum/certainty seems ill-advised.
Also von Neumann is a smart dude, but not, like, a prophet or anything.
Edit: You realize you are being triggered by writing from 50 years ago? Wild.
Imagine someone reposting random vaguely relevant Bible verses to essays you read. And then when you complain, they respond with an AI explanation for why that vaguely related Bible verse is relevant. You’d probably find that annoying too!
Why do you think this is helpful? The way you’re deploying it, it seems like a fully general argument against any form of foresight. Obviously the essay is pretty good and a useful lens but using it as a fully general dictum/certainty seems ill-advised.
Also von Neumann is a smart dude, but not, like, a prophet or anything.
Removed. Wrong Think. Good luck!
Imagine someone reposting random vaguely relevant Bible verses to essays you read. And then when you complain, they respond with an AI explanation for why that vaguely related Bible verse is relevant. You’d probably find that annoying too!