One obvious implication of this is that we should be making our homes in warmer climates. Even if you, personally, have high resistance to foul weather, it’s going to be tougher to get people to walk and converse with you year-round in Boston than it would be in Miami.
This conflicts with the observation that, at least in modern times, the colder parts of the world have tended to produce the better thinkers. I’m not sure it would be smart to move from Cambridge to South Beach in hopes of leading a more intellectually fruitful life...
Yes, it’s been noted (I don’t have the citation handy) that internet startups, for instance, work better in places with warmer climates, presumably for this reason (though Boston seems to be a notable counterexample).
in modern times, the colder parts of the world have tended to produce the better thinkers.
I would take the Bay Area to be a counterexample to this.
The Caribbean, India, Brazil, Mali, Saudi Arabia. These places are hot, not the Bay Area.
In any case. From a somewhat global experience: Colder-> More productivity and Intelligence
I suppose this happens because: Warm → More places to go → more gatherings → More friends and mates → More time spent on humour, social display, human contact, warmness, swimming etc… → more groups → Lower maximal threshold of intelligence for a conversation (Conversation with too much inferential distance regarding almost any topic or moral sense between Alpha and Omega, thus requiring “Friends series” level of superficial-ness to work)
→ Less need to commit brains to intelligence of non-humour non-pragmatic-money-work kind
If you have great and funny friends by the swimming pool, and your status decreases every time your intelligence triggers, why exactly will you read Principia Mathematica?
There’s been some speculation that one reason warmer areas have been less productive is that they were more conducive to having parasites around which reduced the average intelligence of the population (which could have also longer-lasting impact on culture and values after the parasites have been eradticated). Hookworm and Guinea worm seem to be the most commonly mentioned examples of this. The good news is that if this is correct then the ongoing projects to eradicate parasites should help raise the general intelligence of the population.
One thing to keep in mind here is that what matters most for people being really smart is the size of the far end of the tail of the distribution (since that’s where the smart people who accomplish things lie). So a small shift in the bell curve can result in a large shift in the relative fraction of the population that is far right enough in the distribution.
One obvious implication of this is that we should be making our homes in warmer climates. Even if you, personally, have high resistance to foul weather, it’s going to be tougher to get people to walk and converse with you year-round in Boston than it would be in Miami.
This conflicts with the observation that, at least in modern times, the colder parts of the world have tended to produce the better thinkers. I’m not sure it would be smart to move from Cambridge to South Beach in hopes of leading a more intellectually fruitful life...
Yes, it’s been noted (I don’t have the citation handy) that internet startups, for instance, work better in places with warmer climates, presumably for this reason (though Boston seems to be a notable counterexample).
I would take the Bay Area to be a counterexample to this.
The Caribbean, India, Brazil, Mali, Saudi Arabia. These places are hot, not the Bay Area.
In any case. From a somewhat global experience: Colder-> More productivity and Intelligence I suppose this happens because: Warm → More places to go → more gatherings → More friends and mates → More time spent on humour, social display, human contact, warmness, swimming etc… → more groups → Lower maximal threshold of intelligence for a conversation (Conversation with too much inferential distance regarding almost any topic or moral sense between Alpha and Omega, thus requiring “Friends series” level of superficial-ness to work) → Less need to commit brains to intelligence of non-humour non-pragmatic-money-work kind
If you have great and funny friends by the swimming pool, and your status decreases every time your intelligence triggers, why exactly will you read Principia Mathematica?
There’s been some speculation that one reason warmer areas have been less productive is that they were more conducive to having parasites around which reduced the average intelligence of the population (which could have also longer-lasting impact on culture and values after the parasites have been eradticated). Hookworm and Guinea worm seem to be the most commonly mentioned examples of this. The good news is that if this is correct then the ongoing projects to eradicate parasites should help raise the general intelligence of the population.
One thing to keep in mind here is that what matters most for people being really smart is the size of the far end of the tail of the distribution (since that’s where the smart people who accomplish things lie). So a small shift in the bell curve can result in a large shift in the relative fraction of the population that is far right enough in the distribution.
Well, what’s the Internet for if not this? Wear a headset and chat to interesting people while using an exercise machine...