The primarily alarming thing is that you are stating claims in subtly wrong ways, and when I point it out, you keep agreeing (as you also did in this thread), without engaging on substance, as if there’s no difference. I have no way of knowing if you do see the points I’m making, since you don’t signal that you do (agreeing without clarification doesn’t signal that; it’s possible that you do, but I still don’t know).
This feels a bit exhausting to get into, maybe I will tomorrow morning—just letting you know that I saw it.
(I generally oppose the norm of there being any obligation to respond in any detail or at all, and regret the possibility that my actions might be feeding it. The intent was to explain the background of what got me argumentative here. I don’t really endorse how I’m handling my side in this thread. This is a sufficiently unusual situation that I’m not sure what to do, other than the simpler out of staying silent.)
This feels a bit exhausting to get into, maybe I will tomorrow morning—just letting you know that I saw it.
(I generally oppose the norm of there being any obligation to respond in any detail or at all, and regret the possibility that my actions might be feeding it. The intent was to explain the background of what got me argumentative here. I don’t really endorse how I’m handling my side in this thread. This is a sufficiently unusual situation that I’m not sure what to do, other than the simpler out of staying silent.)
Thanks Vladimir, really appreciate that actually.