I did have good intentions, I just like to make my exposition as clear and well-thought-through as possible. But that’s fine, I think we have rather different views, and you’re under no obligation to engage with mine. Your alternative would be to wait until my reply stabilizes before replying to it, which is generally O(an hour). Remaining typo density is another cue. Sadly there is no draft option on the replies, and I can’t be bothered to do the editing somewhere else. Most interloctors don’t reply as quickly as you have been, so this hasn’t previously caused problems that I’m aware of.
On “playing with definitions” — actually, I’m saying that, IMO, some thinkers associated with MIRI have done so (see the second paragraph of my previous post).
I did have good intentions, I just like to make my exposition as clear and well-thought-through as possible. But that’s fine, I think we have rather different views, and you’re under no obligation to engage with mine. Your alternative would be to wait until my reply stabilizes before replying to it, which is generally O(an hour). Remaining typo density is another cue. Sadly there is no draft option on the replies, and I can’t be bothered to do the editing somewhere else. Most interloctors don’t reply as quickly as you have been, so this hasn’t previously caused problems that I’m aware of.
On “playing with definitions” — actually, I’m saying that, IMO, some thinkers associated with MIRI have done so (see the second paragraph of my previous post).