If Fairshake’s $100 million was this influential, to the point that “politicians are advised that crypto is the single most important industry to avoid pissing off”, why don’t other industries spend similar amounts on super PACs? $100 million is just not that much money.
I agree, and therefore you should update toward the people at Fairshake being very good at politics, rather than the money at Fairshake being sufficiently large to buy a congress, and so get worried when Algon Daniel Eth claims that the people who were behind Fairshake will be behind Leading the Future, as they will have the political weight of Fairshake behind them to bootstrap Leading the Future.
That is, given limited success in just buying congressional votes, one should infer the bottleneck is not money, but something else, likely talent or connections.
Daniel Eth claims this. This is a linkpost. Says so at the top of the post. Sorry for the confusion! I added a screenshot from the start of the twitter thread. Hope that the edit make this clearer.
I agree, and therefore you should update toward the people at Fairshake being very good at politics, rather than the money at Fairshake being sufficiently large to buy a congress, and so get worried when
AlgonDaniel Eth claims that the people who were behind Fairshake will be behind Leading the Future, as they will have the political weight of Fairshake behind them to bootstrap Leading the Future.That is, given limited success in just buying congressional votes, one should infer the bottleneck is not money, but something else, likely talent or connections.
Daniel Eth claims this. This is a linkpost. Says so at the top of the post. Sorry for the confusion! I added a screenshot from the start of the twitter thread. Hope that the edit make this clearer.