Thanks for your reaction, and sorry for my late response (I noticed your comment just yesterday, because I assumed I will be notified immediately, which I wasn’t).
If I am correct, the economics and the psychology treat single human as the preference holder, however, in connection to biology and subsequently to physics as well, neither these preferences nor their holders are necessarily fundamental, and in connection to my idea not necessarily uniform/identical from one holder to another, and I wouldn’t be looking for these. So according to my idea, the method for selection of also-ethical-theory would demand such equality of the preferences across their holders (in terms of scientific simplicity). Thus, the division of reality to ‘fundamental’ preference holders that would result in their non-identical preferences would be treated as an incorrect division.
And therefore, the actual subject of scientific inquiry would be unknown from its start, and possibly revised from time to time, but still according to the same method of division of reality to uniform fundamental units and modeling their preferences and evaluating their fitness to observation, etc..
I hope I answered most of your most important questions. Best.
Thanks for your reaction, and sorry for my late response (I noticed your comment just yesterday, because I assumed I will be notified immediately, which I wasn’t).
If I am correct, the economics and the psychology treat single human as the preference holder, however, in connection to biology and subsequently to physics as well, neither these preferences nor their holders are necessarily fundamental, and in connection to my idea not necessarily uniform/identical from one holder to another, and I wouldn’t be looking for these. So according to my idea, the method for selection of also-ethical-theory would demand such equality of the preferences across their holders (in terms of scientific simplicity). Thus, the division of reality to ‘fundamental’ preference holders that would result in their non-identical preferences would be treated as an incorrect division.
And therefore, the actual subject of scientific inquiry would be unknown from its start, and possibly revised from time to time, but still according to the same method of division of reality to uniform fundamental units and modeling their preferences and evaluating their fitness to observation, etc..
I hope I answered most of your most important questions. Best.