Isn’t it logically impossible to determine this, without there being a widely accepted definition of “Artifical Intelligence” in the first place? (accepted by all relevant parties)
Suprisingly 6 different users downvoted a straightforward comment without explanation… so I imagine that also indicates a bot problem which has to be factored in, (or at least users replicating bot behavior)
There clearly are bots capable of typing this out… unless you’ve never browsed through twitter/X before? (which seems very implausible considering your >6y old account)
A meaningful non bot explanation would contain some reason(s) for the opinion. I don’t think you need me to enumerate but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt: Usually provided in the form of a logical argument, linked sources, comparison, etc…
Isn’t it logically impossible to determine this, without there being a widely accepted definition of “Artifical Intelligence” in the first place? (accepted by all relevant parties)
Suprisingly 6 different users downvoted a straightforward comment without explanation… so I imagine that also indicates a bot problem which has to be factored in, (or at least users replicating bot behavior)
I downvoted because it seems obviously wrong and irrelevant to me.
There clearly are bots capable of typing this out… unless you’ve never browsed through twitter/X before? (which seems very implausible considering your >6y old account)
A meaningful non bot explanation would contain some reason(s) for the opinion. I don’t think you need me to enumerate but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt: Usually provided in the form of a logical argument, linked sources, comparison, etc…