EY has done an avowedly very incomplete treatment of QM here with some math. Your comment at the top here doesn’t really apply but you’re applying it anyway.
I think that you’re saying that the QM is hypocritical ’cause it has no maths, and Luke is saying that the fact that it has some maths might redeem it.
Not sure what you are asking...
EY has done an avowedly very incomplete treatment of QM here with some math. Your comment at the top here doesn’t really apply but you’re applying it anyway.
It was catchy, but not pithy.
I think that you’re saying that the QM is hypocritical ’cause it has no maths, and Luke is saying that the fact that it has some maths might redeem it.