I do not share those intuitions/expectations at all.
And I think the human brain is a universal learner. I believe that we are closer to the peak of bounded physical intelligence than we are to an ant.
And I also think evolution already faced significantly diminishing marginal returns on human cognitive enhancement (the increased disease burden of Ashkenazi Jews for example).
I think that using human biology as a guide is misleading. As far as I am aware, for every measurable task where AI surpassed humans, it blew past the human level of capability without slowing down. As far as I am aware, there is a lot of evidence (however indirect) that human-level intelligence is nothing special (as in—more of an arbitrary point on the spectrum) from the AI, or any other non-human-biology-focused perspective, and no evidence to the contrary. Is there?
I do not share those intuitions/expectations at all.
And I think the human brain is a universal learner. I believe that we are closer to the peak of bounded physical intelligence than we are to an ant.
And I also think evolution already faced significantly diminishing marginal returns on human cognitive enhancement (the increased disease burden of Ashkenazi Jews for example).
I think that using human biology as a guide is misleading. As far as I am aware, for every measurable task where AI surpassed humans, it blew past the human level of capability without slowing down. As far as I am aware, there is a lot of evidence (however indirect) that human-level intelligence is nothing special (as in—more of an arbitrary point on the spectrum) from the AI, or any other non-human-biology-focused perspective, and no evidence to the contrary. Is there?