It’s not really clear why you would have the searching process be more powerful than the evaluating process
Because the first supposes a powerful AI, while the second supposes an excellent evaluation process (essentially a value alignment problem solved).
Your post motivated this in part, but it’s a more general issue with optimisation processes and searches.
Neither the search nor the evaluation presupposes an AI when a hypothetical process is used as the definition of “good.”
Because the first supposes a powerful AI, while the second supposes an excellent evaluation process (essentially a value alignment problem solved).
Your post motivated this in part, but it’s a more general issue with optimisation processes and searches.
Neither the search nor the evaluation presupposes an AI when a hypothetical process is used as the definition of “good.”