It’s been suggested that, if I should comment, you should go with my opinion. However, I will not give my opinion: I have a strong prior bias that everyone should read the Book of Mormon for the benefit of their eternal well-being; therefore, I judge myself unfit to offer an unbiased opinion in this matter, for much the same reason that you posted this article in the first place.
I will offer this point: It behooves us to examine the strongest points of opposing arguments. If someone were wanting to know more about atheism, you’d expect them to read atheist literature, not meta- atheist literature.
It’s been suggested that, if I should comment, you should go with my opinion. However, I will not give my opinion: I have a strong prior bias that everyone should read the Book of Mormon for the benefit of their eternal well-being; therefore, I judge myself unfit to offer an unbiased opinion in this matter, for much the same reason that you posted this article in the first place.
I will offer this point: It behooves us to examine the strongest points of opposing arguments. If someone were wanting to know more about atheism, you’d expect them to read atheist literature, not meta- atheist literature.