I think you’re spot on with the “internally predictable world”. One can observe patterns in the world, and make the bet that these originate from an underlying regularity.
Then there are no evidence, only experiences that are more compatible (in the Bayesian sense) with one model than with an other, which you use to make the bet that this model is more likely to predict the regularities well than other models.
I think you’re spot on with the “internally predictable world”. One can observe patterns in the world, and make the bet that these originate from an underlying regularity.
Then there are no evidence, only experiences that are more compatible (in the Bayesian sense) with one model than with an other, which you use to make the bet that this model is more likely to predict the regularities well than other models.