When we hear someone talking about a god, we can make a valid inference that this is caused by a god existing or having existed in the past.
It is valid Bayesian evidence, yes. We can’t consistently expect that people talking about gods is less likely in worlds where gods do exist. (Of course, other explanations remain far more probable, given background knowledge; it’s hardly a proof.)
It is valid Bayesian evidence, yes. We can’t consistently expect that people talking about gods is less likely in worlds where gods do exist. (Of course, other explanations remain far more probable, given background knowledge; it’s hardly a proof.)