none of my business. am I alone in thinking that justice is between victims and perpetrators and the rest of us don’t need to have an opinion?
is the idea behind this post that us rationalists should be judges, as we are more qualified as impartial arbiters than others? I’d hesitate to claim competency in such an unfamiliar and broad domain space as being a judge. I guess most don’t find the domain space “unfamiliar” since they envision themselves as the ultimate arbiter on a daily basis.
Are you from somewhere without a jury system? These aren’t questions of jurisprudence, they’re questions of fact. You are more than competent. Indeed, far less competent people routinely make these decisions.
none of my business. am I alone in thinking that justice is between victims and perpetrators and the rest of us don’t need to have an opinion?
is the idea behind this post that us rationalists should be judges, as we are more qualified as impartial arbiters than others? I’d hesitate to claim competency in such an unfamiliar and broad domain space as being a judge. I guess most don’t find the domain space “unfamiliar” since they envision themselves as the ultimate arbiter on a daily basis.
Are you from somewhere without a jury system? These aren’t questions of jurisprudence, they’re questions of fact. You are more than competent. Indeed, far less competent people routinely make these decisions.