Pascal’s Wager and the AI/acausal trade thought experiments are related conceptually, in that they reason about entities arbitrarily more powerful than humans, but they are not intended to prove or discuss similar claims and are subject to very different counterarguments. Your very brief posts do not make me think otherwise. I think you need to make your premises and inferential steps explicit, for our benefit and for yours.
Is the Many Gods refutation written down somewhere in a rigorous way?
https://www.quora.com/How-convincing-is-Pascals-Wager-to-you-What-are-some-well-appreciated-criticisms-against-it-Have-people-like-Richard-Feynman-expressed-their-take-on-this
This link isn’t working for me.
Pascal’s Wager and the AI/acausal trade thought experiments are related conceptually, in that they reason about entities arbitrarily more powerful than humans, but they are not intended to prove or discuss similar claims and are subject to very different counterarguments. Your very brief posts do not make me think otherwise. I think you need to make your premises and inferential steps explicit, for our benefit and for yours.