I have to admit, I don’t have a tremendous amount of sympathy for people who lose out while partaking in an endeavour which is pretty much designed to have more losers than winners.
I’m not sure what the point of this comment is other than taking a dig at poker players, but poker requires a more direct application of the lessons of rationality than anything else I can think of at the moment.
I have to admit, I don’t have a tremendous amount of sympathy for people who lose out while partaking in an endeavour which is pretty much designed to have more losers than winners.
I’m not sure what the point of this comment is other than taking a dig at poker players, but poker requires a more direct application of the lessons of rationality than anything else I can think of at the moment.
The point was that it’s a zero-sum game. Someone has to lose. Why shouldn’t it be them?