I’m working under the what should not be controversial assumption that the AGI isn’t going to find out that in fact there is such a deity hanging around.
Just as helpfully, if the FAI concludes that there is a deity around who we should please and who would prefer objecting to gay marriage, it will properly regard that as a value.
Or, presumably, if it concludes that there might some day come to be a deity, or other vastly powerful entity, who would prefer having objected to gay marriage.
Of course, all of this further presumes that there aren’t/won’t be other vastly powerful entities whose preferences have equal weight in opposite directions.
Just as helpfully, if the FAI concludes that there is a deity around who we should please and who would prefer objecting to gay marriage, it will properly regard that as a value.
Or, presumably, if it concludes that there might some day come to be a deity, or other vastly powerful entity, who would prefer having objected to gay marriage.
Of course, all of this further presumes that there aren’t/won’t be other vastly powerful entities whose preferences have equal weight in opposite directions.