Chomsky had demolished behaviorist linguistics in 1959, nine years before Quine’s article.
Presumably you are talking about his critique of Skinner’s book: Verbal Behavior—which was mainly focussed on the emphasis on operant conditioning, arguing instead for innate elements. AFAICS, Skinner never denied a role for genetics in the first place:
Skinner argued that verbal behavior is a function of the speaker’s current environment and his past behavioral and genetic history.
The article also says:
Chomsky’s review has been further noted to misrepresent the work of Skinner and others, including by taking quotes out of context.
Presumably you are talking about his critique of Skinner’s book: Verbal Behavior—which was mainly focussed on the emphasis on operant conditioning, arguing instead for innate elements. AFAICS, Skinner never denied a role for genetics in the first place:
The article also says: