To me, I think the “likelihood to dominate others” factor is less salient than the “likelihood to produce safe AGI” factor. Are there good arguments that China is better on AGI safety?
They seem to have any central policy at all, which is good if you think the AI technologies currently under development will produce unsafe AGI unless they are intelligently centrally managed.
To me, I think the “likelihood to dominate others” factor is less salient than the “likelihood to produce safe AGI” factor. Are there good arguments that China is better on AGI safety?
They seem to have any central policy at all, which is good if you think the AI technologies currently under development will produce unsafe AGI unless they are intelligently centrally managed.