.I also cannot resist noting, yet again, that all interpretation of QM that rely on solving the Schrodinger equation have exactly the same complexity, as estimated above, and so cannot be distinguished by the Occam’s razor.
I would be happy to see a different formalization of it… What I have tried to use here is something like the Minimum Message Length formalism (only without the “Minimum” part, since it is not easily computable), which is, admittedly, a rather simplistic approach. Hopefully someone can do better.
That way of formalizing Occam’s razor, anyway.
I would be happy to see a different formalization of it… What I have tried to use here is something like the Minimum Message Length formalism (only without the “Minimum” part, since it is not easily computable), which is, admittedly, a rather simplistic approach. Hopefully someone can do better.