I put very little stock in that study. It’s a small effect (Fig. 3), there’s hints of p-hacking (one of their p-values is p=0.049, and they seem to have done a lot of tests with no bonferroni correction), and at the end the measurement is a questionnaire but questionnaire data can’t always be taken at face value.
I put very little stock in that study. It’s a small effect (Fig. 3), there’s hints of p-hacking (one of their p-values is p=0.049, and they seem to have done a lot of tests with no bonferroni correction), and at the end the measurement is a questionnaire but questionnaire data can’t always be taken at face value.