Your argument leaves out necessary steps. It is not a careful analysis, does not consider ways in which it might be mistaken, but gives rise to the impression that you wanted to get to your conclusion as quickly as possible.
There is, necessarily, absolutely no way to determine—given an algorithm—whether it is conscious or not. It is not even a formally undecidable statement!
It is unclear how this follows from anything you wrote.
consciousness refuses to be phrased formally (it is subjective, and computation is objective)
Consider tabooing words like “subjective” and “objective”.
Your argument leaves out necessary steps. It is not a careful analysis, does not consider ways in which it might be mistaken, but gives rise to the impression that you wanted to get to your conclusion as quickly as possible.
It is unclear how this follows from anything you wrote.
Consider tabooing words like “subjective” and “objective”.