That’s obviously the default best recommendation unless someone finds serious evidence of a better way, but I’m pretty sure that the goal of the study is to see if there’s already serious evidence of a better way out there.
There isn’t really, my paper is basically suggesting that this null hypothesis is not rejected. A sad state of affairs.
That’s obviously the default best recommendation unless someone finds serious evidence of a better way, but I’m pretty sure that the goal of the study is to see if there’s already serious evidence of a better way out there.
There isn’t really, my paper is basically suggesting that this null hypothesis is not rejected. A sad state of affairs.