Is discussing preferences in sports, climate, food, art, attractiveness, … also pointless? There are a great many preferences that we have, but not identically, and not assuming there is an objective “right” preference, that we discuss nevertheless.
This is the moral standard we are talking about.
No more than “we” are all talking about the same thing when “we” say God.
Is discussing preferences in sports, climate, food, art, attractiveness, … also pointless? There are a great many preferences that we have, but not identically, and not assuming there is an objective “right” preference, that we discuss nevertheless.
No more than “we” are all talking about the same thing when “we” say God.
Is Clippy talking about the same moral standard?