There’s clearly something wrong with choosing your absolute favorite. For most people that might well be themselves, and then we would have 300 million candidates with 1 vote each. (Pirate King, anyone?)
So you do have to vote to some degree strategically. But maybe this is a balance; like voting for the Libertarian Party or Green Party may actually make sense, because they have some chance of winning even if it’s relatively small.
Because otherwise, it really does seem to me that you are handing a free vote to your least-favorite lizard.
Even if I was just chooosing the “monarch” I wouldn’t pick myself. Deciding who is the right combination of trustworthy and smart is hard but the answer is surely not me (trustworthy is more important btw). I am pretty trustworthy but I am way too lazy and not nearly suffiently riisk averse in action. I “feel” like me being the president and just letting whoever is actually the best make the decisions is safer, but the base rate on this seem too low.
There’s clearly something wrong with choosing your absolute favorite. For most people that might well be themselves, and then we would have 300 million candidates with 1 vote each. (Pirate King, anyone?)
So you do have to vote to some degree strategically. But maybe this is a balance; like voting for the Libertarian Party or Green Party may actually make sense, because they have some chance of winning even if it’s relatively small.
Because otherwise, it really does seem to me that you are handing a free vote to your least-favorite lizard.
Even if I was just chooosing the “monarch” I wouldn’t pick myself. Deciding who is the right combination of trustworthy and smart is hard but the answer is surely not me (trustworthy is more important btw). I am pretty trustworthy but I am way too lazy and not nearly suffiently riisk averse in action. I “feel” like me being the president and just letting whoever is actually the best make the decisions is safer, but the base rate on this seem too low.