As someone who has read quite a few of your blogposts a few months ago and liked them, and also spends a lot of time reading LessWrong, I would strongly advise posting the handtyped version (not the Fable ones, which are maybe more rigorous but are much less enjoyable to read) of your more popular posts directly on LessWrong, as opposed to a link to them hidden behind an unenticing title[1] like “Working on Economics with Fable 5” that causes a would-be reader to expect content less interesting and novel than it actually is.
Specifically, this is unenticing because it makes the reader expect the content to be high grade AI slop that appears superficially good on the surface, but would end up being a waste of time to read/offer nothing that a direct conversation with Fable 5 wouldn’t offer.
As someone who has read quite a few of your blogposts a few months ago and liked them, and also spends a lot of time reading LessWrong, I would strongly advise posting the handtyped version (not the Fable ones, which are maybe more rigorous but are much less enjoyable to read) of your more popular posts directly on LessWrong, as opposed to a link to them hidden behind an unenticing title [1] like “Working on Economics with Fable 5” that causes a would-be reader to expect content less interesting and novel than it actually is.
Specifically, this is unenticing because it makes the reader expect the content to be high grade AI slop that appears superficially good on the surface, but would end up being a waste of time to read/offer nothing that a direct conversation with Fable 5 wouldn’t offer.