What I objected to about the creationists was that they were not worthy opponents with whom I disagree; they’re just crackpots. Go to a biology conference, read a biology journal, spend time in a biology department; nobody is arguing about the possibility that an ill-specified supernatural “designer” is interfering at whim with the course of evolution. It’s not a serious idea. It may be out there in the public sphere as an idea that garners attention—but, as we all know, that holds true for all sorts of non-serious ideas.
We been known to shoot us some subjectivists ’round these here parts, y’hear?
Sean Carrol concurs