It seems like science snobbery. BHTV has loads of political commentary—and other non-science. It just isn’t remotely like a peer-reviewed science journal.
PZ Myers says no to BHTV: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/09/phil_plait_ditches_blogginghea.php
Phil Plait pulls the plug on BHTV: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/09/04/bloggingheads-capo-non-grata/
Robert Wright discusses the whole issue on BHTV:
http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/22300
He says 48 minutes in that the Templeton foundation “were no longer” and that they only supported the site for four months.
However, their ads are still on the sponsored videos beneath:
http://bloggingheads.tv/percontations
...so the Templeton foundation link apparently remains. Maybe there will be no more percontations, though.
Wright gives much the same arguments about ID as I give—in the section on “Viable Intelligent Design Hypotheses”—on:
http://originoflife.net/intelligent_design/
It seems like science snobbery. BHTV has loads of political commentary—and other non-science. It just isn’t remotely like a peer-reviewed science journal.
PZ Myers says no to BHTV: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/09/phil_plait_ditches_blogginghea.php
Phil Plait pulls the plug on BHTV: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/09/04/bloggingheads-capo-non-grata/
Robert Wright discusses the whole issue on BHTV:
http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/22300
He says 48 minutes in that the Templeton foundation “were no longer” and that they only supported the site for four months.
However, their ads are still on the sponsored videos beneath:
http://bloggingheads.tv/percontations
...so the Templeton foundation link apparently remains. Maybe there will be no more percontations, though.
Wright gives much the same arguments about ID as I give—in the section on “Viable Intelligent Design Hypotheses”—on:
http://originoflife.net/intelligent_design/