BTW, in UDT1.1 (as well as UDT1), “input” consists of the agent’s entire memory of the past as well as its current perceptions. Thought I’d mention that in case there’s a misunderstanding there.
Yes, that works too. If you can make “inputs and outputs” into anything, sure you can represent any strategy with them. I’m not sure it makes sense to separate them in that case though—just make the whole strategy as the sole product of decision-making; interpretation of this product is a separate question, and doesn’t necessarily need to be addressed at all.
Yes, that works too. If you can make “inputs and outputs” into anything, sure you can represent any strategy with them. I’m not sure it makes sense to separate them in that case though—just make the whole strategy as the sole product of decision-making; interpretation of this product is a separate question, and doesn’t necessarily need to be addressed at all.