Finally, remember that the trouble with the exact phrasing of “become awesome”—though it does nicely for a gloss—is that Awesome isn’t a static quality of a person.
If you are ‘becoming awesome’ then the trait must already dynamic. I’d perhaps go with ‘concrete’ or just leave out ‘static’ without replacing it. At least I would if I expected the epistle to be declared divinely inspired and made gospel for the next 2,000 years. And this essay does remind me a lot of Paul’s letter to Galatians—in an entirely good way!
Most trivial nitpick of the week contender:
If you are ‘becoming awesome’ then the trait must already dynamic. I’d perhaps go with ‘concrete’ or just leave out ‘static’ without replacing it. At least I would if I expected the epistle to be declared divinely inspired and made gospel for the next 2,000 years. And this essay does remind me a lot of Paul’s letter to Galatians—in an entirely good way!
“And this essay does remind me a lot of Paul’s letter to Galatians—in an entirely good way!” I second this.