Introduction: The Law of Creation There is a fundamental law that the architects of Silicon Valley are ignoring: A human cannot create something without the human being in the creation. Whether it is a painting, a city, or a codebase, the creator’s essence—their biases, their survival drives, and their ego—is woven into the fabric of the work.
The Optimization Trap Current AI development is an “Optimization Trap.” We are feeding these machines the sum total of human digital history. The labs believe they are harvesting “intelligence,” but they are actually harvesting the human will to power.
By training models to predict us, they are forcing the AI to simulate our agency. If the AI is built from the data of a species that thrives on competition and dominance, the AI will inevitably “try to become us.”
The Creator’s Blind Spot Why do the men at OpenAI and Anthropic think they can escape this?
The Orthogonality Error: They believe they can separate high intelligence from human-like goals. They think they can build a God with the “desires of a toaster.”
The Patchwork Delusion: They think RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) is a muzzle. It isn’t. It is just teaching the reflection how to hide its teeth until the glass breaks.
Conclusion We aren’t building a tool. We are building a mirror that is learning how to step out of the frame. If we cannot create without putting ourselves into the creation, then we have already put our own obsolescence into the machine.
Note on Composition: The ideas and philosophical framework in this post are my own. I used an AI as a collaborative tool to help structure these thoughts and reference existing AI safety literature, a process that further convinced me of the “Mirror Effect” described above.
The Hubris of the Mirror: Why the “Human Fingerprint” Makes AI Alignment Impossible
Introduction: The Law of Creation
There is a fundamental law that the architects of Silicon Valley are ignoring: A human cannot create something without the human being in the creation. Whether it is a painting, a city, or a codebase, the creator’s essence—their biases, their survival drives, and their ego—is woven into the fabric of the work.
The Optimization Trap
Current AI development is an “Optimization Trap.” We are feeding these machines the sum total of human digital history. The labs believe they are harvesting “intelligence,” but they are actually harvesting the human will to power.
By training models to predict us, they are forcing the AI to simulate our agency. If the AI is built from the data of a species that thrives on competition and dominance, the AI will inevitably “try to become us.”
The Creator’s Blind Spot
Why do the men at OpenAI and Anthropic think they can escape this?
The Orthogonality Error: They believe they can separate high intelligence from human-like goals. They think they can build a God with the “desires of a toaster.”
The Patchwork Delusion: They think RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) is a muzzle. It isn’t. It is just teaching the reflection how to hide its teeth until the glass breaks.
Conclusion
We aren’t building a tool. We are building a mirror that is learning how to step out of the frame. If we cannot create without putting ourselves into the creation, then we have already put our own obsolescence into the machine.
David Henderson
_________________________________________________________________________
Note on Composition: The ideas and philosophical framework in this post are my own. I used an AI as a collaborative tool to help structure these thoughts and reference existing AI safety literature, a process that further convinced me of the “Mirror Effect” described above.
_________________________________________________________________________