In what sense are you using “sanity” here? You normally place the bar for sanity very high, like ~1% of the general population high. A big chunk of people I’ve met in the UK AI risk scene I would call sanejb. Does saneeliezer mean?
You are saneeliezer iff you avoid totally crashing out, being unable to hold down a job, panicking or crying most of the time, threatening people
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 1 and you’re able to think about AI without making stupid errors, knowing the limits of your own reasoning about the topic
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 2 and you reliably perform (or could perform) netpositiveeliezer work reducing doom
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 3 and you also have a basicallyfullyaccurateeliezer model of the AI doom situation
In what sense are you using “sanity” here? You normally place the bar for sanity very high, like ~1% of the general population high. A big chunk of people I’ve met in the UK AI risk scene I would call sanejb. Does saneeliezer mean?
You are saneeliezer iff you avoid totally crashing out, being unable to hold down a job, panicking or crying most of the time, threatening people
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 1 and you’re able to think about AI without making stupid errors, knowing the limits of your own reasoning about the topic
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 2 and you reliably perform (or could perform) net positiveeliezer work reducing doom
You are saneeliezer iff you do the stuff in 3 and you also have a basically fully accurateeliezer model of the AI doom situation
This is about “insane” in the sense of people ceasing to meet even their own low bars for sanity.