If you’re thinking economically, I’m quite confident that children born from surrogates on average will have higher incomes and therefore pay much more tax per capita than children who have spent time in foster care.
I’m not sure if Foster Care costs are a good model for how to create people who “thrive”—most importantly on an existential level—are they emotionally satisfied? But from an economic argument, I assume that whatever foster kids are getting is not the optimal to make them productive in terms of future income, and therefore the taxes they can pay.
If you’re thinking economically, I’m quite confident that children born from surrogates on average will have higher incomes and therefore pay much more tax per capita than children who have spent time in foster care.
I’m not sure if Foster Care costs are a good model for how to create people who “thrive”—most importantly on an existential level—are they emotionally satisfied? But from an economic argument, I assume that whatever foster kids are getting is not the optimal to make them productive in terms of future income, and therefore the taxes they can pay.