So, if one gets access to the knowledge about moral absolutes by being smart enough then one of the following is true :
average humans are smart enough to see the moral absolutes in the universe
average humans are not smart enough to see the moral absolutes
average humans are right on the line between smart enough and not smart enough
If average humans are smart enough, then we should also know how the moral absolutes are derived from the physics of the universe and all humans should agree on them, including psychopaths. This seems false. Humans do not all agree.
If humans are not smart enough then it’s just an implausible coincidence that your values are the ones the SuperAGI will know are true. How do you know that you aren’t wrong about the objective reality of morality?
If humans are right on the line between smart enough and not smart enough, isn’t it an implausible coincidence that’s the case?
So, if one gets access to the knowledge about moral absolutes by being smart enough then one of the following is true :
average humans are smart enough to see the moral absolutes in the universe
average humans are not smart enough to see the moral absolutes
average humans are right on the line between smart enough and not smart enough
If average humans are smart enough, then we should also know how the moral absolutes are derived from the physics of the universe and all humans should agree on them, including psychopaths. This seems false. Humans do not all agree.
If humans are not smart enough then it’s just an implausible coincidence that your values are the ones the SuperAGI will know are true. How do you know that you aren’t wrong about the objective reality of morality?
If humans are right on the line between smart enough and not smart enough, isn’t it an implausible coincidence that’s the case?