Tring to remember my state of mind when I wrote that (Yesterday), I think my objection was to the stronger statement that this explains all or most facial expressions.
Today, after reading your and Raemon’s responses, I find it a bit more plausible that more expressions have immediate functional explanations. But defiantly not all.
I’m trying to think of a way to give a confidence interval, but I don’t even know what it would mean for 20% of facial expression to have immediate functional explanations. What is meant by “20%”? What’s the measure?
Tring to remember my state of mind when I wrote that (Yesterday), I think my objection was to the stronger statement that this explains all or most facial expressions.
Today, after reading your and Raemon’s responses, I find it a bit more plausible that more expressions have immediate functional explanations. But defiantly not all.
I’m trying to think of a way to give a confidence interval, but I don’t even know what it would mean for 20% of facial expression to have immediate functional explanations. What is meant by “20%”? What’s the measure?