This is the subtext implied in the saying, “A Lannister always pays his debts,” from A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Margin. It is frequently applied in the context of compensating someone for helping one of the Lannisters, but it also functions as a warning against misdeeds.
Incidentally, I would point out that I’m pretty sure I’ve read of psychology experiments where self-inflicted pain is rated as less painful than the same electrical shocks inflicted by another person.
I wonder what would happen where the pain is something like a needle-stick in a blood donation:
Inflicted by someone else, but with the consent of the person experiencing it.
Presumably the element of malice wouldn’t be present...
This seems obviously true, but why is it true?
There’s not point being annoyed at nature, but a precommitment to revenge is useful.
This is the subtext implied in the saying, “A Lannister always pays his debts,” from A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Margin. It is frequently applied in the context of compensating someone for helping one of the Lannisters, but it also functions as a warning against misdeeds.
Incidentally, I would point out that I’m pretty sure I’ve read of psychology experiments where self-inflicted pain is rated as less painful than the same electrical shocks inflicted by another person.
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2008). The sting of intentional pain. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1260-1262. pdf
Many thanks for the reference!
I wonder what would happen where the pain is something like a needle-stick in a blood donation: Inflicted by someone else, but with the consent of the person experiencing it. Presumably the element of malice wouldn’t be present...