To clarify, I listed some of Williamson’s claims, but I haven’t summarised any of his arguments.
I think even still, if these are the claims he’s making, none of them seem particularly relevant to the question of “whether the mechanisms we expect to automate science and math will also automate philosophy”.
I think even still, if these are the claims he’s making, none of them seem particularly relevant to the question of “whether the mechanisms we expect to automate science and math will also automate philosophy”.