It would be nice if you included a brief summary of your post in the beginning. The title didn’t seem like a very appetizing read to me, and the first paragraph wasn’t very enlightening as to where you were going. Based on this information alone you could have been an insane person trying to convince people you’re right about your pet Epstein theory, and I would have wasted 22 min of my time if I stuck around to the end. Or more realistically, however long it took me to determine conclusively that you were insane.
The only reason why I chose to read it was because it had an abnormally high karma count, and I’m glad I did, as this seemed like a sane, and grounded attempt at analyzing Epstein’s case.
It would be nice if you included a brief summary of your post in the beginning. The title didn’t seem like a very appetizing read to me, and the first paragraph wasn’t very enlightening as to where you were going. Based on this information alone you could have been an insane person trying to convince people you’re right about your pet Epstein theory, and I would have wasted 22 min of my time if I stuck around to the end. Or more realistically, however long it took me to determine conclusively that you were insane.
The only reason why I chose to read it was because it had an abnormally high karma count, and I’m glad I did, as this seemed like a sane, and grounded attempt at analyzing Epstein’s case.