I think I get the spirit. I thought, from the way you phrased it, that you were making an empirical claim (eg: ‘I saw [x better thing] not happen because LessWrong something something’). But it sounds like you’re making a more conceptual argument (which I think has legs, but for different reasons than you do, and I think we disagree on the effect size).
I think I get the spirit. I thought, from the way you phrased it, that you were making an empirical claim (eg: ‘I saw [x better thing] not happen because LessWrong something something’). But it sounds like you’re making a more conceptual argument (which I think has legs, but for different reasons than you do, and I think we disagree on the effect size).
Thanks for responding.