Granting for the sake of argument that a superintelligence can determine that the universe in which it exists has an associated objectively “true” moral system in some sense, what requires it to conform to that system?
In short “I believe that there exists an objectively privileged system in which X is wrong” is far from equivalent to “I believe that X is wrong”. Even the latter is far from equivalent to “I will not do X”.
There are multiple additional weaknesses in the argument, some of which are addressed by other commenters.
Granting for the sake of argument that a superintelligence can determine that the universe in which it exists has an associated objectively “true” moral system in some sense, what requires it to conform to that system?
In short “I believe that there exists an objectively privileged system in which X is wrong” is far from equivalent to “I believe that X is wrong”. Even the latter is far from equivalent to “I will not do X”.
There are multiple additional weaknesses in the argument, some of which are addressed by other commenters.