Not saying your epsitemology can do things it can;’t do.
Motte: We can prove things about reality.
Bailey: We can predict obervations.
That doesn’t seem to be meaningful advice given how “X should not claim it can do things it can’t do” is right there near “You should do good things and not do bad things”.
And aren’t your motte & bailey switched around?
You should do good things and not do bad things
You know that is not universally followed?
I could never imagine such a thing! Next thing you’ll be telling me that people do stupid things on a regular basis :-P
Not saying your epsitemology can do things it can;’t do.
Motte: We can prove things about reality.
Bailey: We can predict obervations.
That doesn’t seem to be meaningful advice given how “X should not claim it can do things it can’t do” is right there near “You should do good things and not do bad things”.
And aren’t your motte & bailey switched around?
You know that is not universally followed?
I could never imagine such a thing! Next thing you’ll be telling me that people do stupid things on a regular basis :-P