Well, yes—it’s more like 3.142857 recurring. But that’s fairly minor.
(Footnote: I originally thought the teachers had performed the division incorrectly, rather than the anonymous commenter incorrectly recount the number, so this comment was briefly incorrect.)
Well, yes—it’s more like 3.142857 recurring. But that’s fairly minor.
(Footnote: I originally thought the teachers had performed the division incorrectly, rather than the anonymous commenter incorrectly recount the number, so this comment was briefly incorrect.)