I agree it doesn’t have much practical value. I thought it was “philosophically” interesting. This is because it seems an important benchmark in terms of our relationship with machines.
The hypothesis is that our intuitive / system 1 aporoximation to treating machines as thinking beings depends on a benchmark we already passed.
I wrote it down because i want to refer it in future pieces (like the one on ai and loneliness)
Sorry for the late reply.
I agree it doesn’t have much practical value. I thought it was “philosophically” interesting. This is because it seems an important benchmark in terms of our relationship with machines.
The hypothesis is that our intuitive / system 1 aporoximation to treating machines as thinking beings depends on a benchmark we already passed.
I wrote it down because i want to refer it in future pieces (like the one on ai and loneliness)