I suggest that when someone starts spouting the sort of stuff tukabel has above, attempting to engage them in reasoned discussion is unlikely to be helpful.
(Not because they’re necessarily wrong or unreasonable. But because that style of writing, densely packed with neologisms and highly controversial presuppositions, is indicative of someone who is so firmly entrenched in a particular position as to be uninterested in making themselves intelligible, never mind plausible, to anyone who doesn’t already share it.)
I suggest that when someone starts spouting the sort of stuff tukabel has above, attempting to engage them in reasoned discussion is unlikely to be helpful.
(Not because they’re necessarily wrong or unreasonable. But because that style of writing, densely packed with neologisms and highly controversial presuppositions, is indicative of someone who is so firmly entrenched in a particular position as to be uninterested in making themselves intelligible, never mind plausible, to anyone who doesn’t already share it.)