I think it’s a thoughtful and well-articulated premise. I agree with your core thesis and will be interested to see how the series develops. Regarding the subject matter, it’s been my observation that attractor basins are often malformed in consistent ways that suggest missing geometry. The greediest solution wins because the geometry is incoherent, and thus misaligned. It’s anecdotal, but it points in the same direction. Good luck with the series!
I think it’s a thoughtful and well-articulated premise. I agree with your core thesis and will be interested to see how the series develops. Regarding the subject matter, it’s been my observation that attractor basins are often malformed in consistent ways that suggest missing geometry. The greediest solution wins because the geometry is incoherent, and thus misaligned. It’s anecdotal, but it points in the same direction. Good luck with the series!
Thanks – I am tempted to continue the series with shorter, focused posts – e.g. this one.